🔗 Share this article

The nation's decisive move to restrict social networking access for individuals under sixteen is sending ripples around the globe. Officials, campaigners, and families are observing intently to see if this tactic will become a template for countries abroad.

The European Movement

In Europe, a increasing chorus of countries are considering comparable measures.

• The Danish government has announced a ban on social media for children under fifteen, with the PM arguing that mobile devices and networks are "stealing our kids' innocence". A law could be enacted next year.
• The Norwegian government is planning to implement a access barrier of 15, citing the need to protect children from the "influence of the recommendation systems".
• The Irish government is working on a digital ID system to confirm the user details of social media participants. Authorities have indicated that an similar ban could be "one of the measures under consideration".
• In The Spanish government, the president has urged parliament to enact a law raising the legal age for accessing social media to 16.
• In The French government, the head of state has proposed a ban for under-15s, and a government panel has endorsed a similar move, alongside an overnight "internet blackout" for older teenagers.
• The authorities in The Netherlands has advised parents to prevent their youngsters from social media up to the age of 15.

For the broader EU, the European parliament has passed a non-binding motion demanding a ban for under-16s without parental consent is given. Although it cautions of the "compulsive" design of these services, the resolution does not enact mandatory rules.

"A clear age limit is a useful first step," stated the parliamentarian behind the measure.

Britain: A Cautious Stance

Across Britain, the administration has remained open to a potential ban, emphasizing that "nothing is discarded" but insisting any action must be "based on conclusive data".

Last year, support grew behind a bill to impose controls on social media use by minors, but it was ultimately watered down. Nonetheless, the government vowed to further research the matter.

Charities have expressed warnings. A prominent charity founded by the relatives of a young person who died after encountering disturbing platform posts suggests that a simple age ban may not protect children and could lead to a "dangerous transition" of risk when teens become eligible.

"The Australian ban is a response to the inability of the tech sector to create platforms and apps that are secure and suitable for young users," stated a leading peer.

The US: A Decentralized Picture

Across America, action is mostly unfolding at the local government level amid national stalemate.

• The state of Utah requires adult approval for under-18s to use social media and restricts late-night use.
• Florida has enacted a measure banning those below 14 from joining social media, though it faces legal challenges.
• The state of Virginia has enacted a regulation capping minors to a single hour of social media time per day, with additional use requiring a guardian's okay.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise enacted measures mandating guardian approval for minors to open social media accounts.

Even with widespread concern and suggestions from various figures to copy this example, a federal ban is presently seen as improbable.

Worldwide Outlook

Outside of these regions, further countries are likewise taking action.

• The Malaysian government intends to prohibit social media for those under sixteen starting from next year.
• Brazil has raised the minimum age for Instagram to 16.

But, global organizations strike a more nuanced stance. Unicef has advised that social media bans carry risks and "might have unintended consequences". The agency highlights that social networks can be a "critical link" for isolated youth and that bans should not be a "substitute" for platform operators to prioritize user protection.

While this international conversation continues, the steps of this nation and others demonstrate that governments around the world are less and less content to delay for the industry to make changes on their own.