🔗 Share this article

This move from the Democratic National Committee to suppress the release regarding its internal autopsy report concerning the last presidential race appears remarkable yet not surprising. Resistant to hard truths, the DNC operates more like a publicity machine rather than a political organization focused on building a volunteer base for winning elections.

An Environment of Conformity

Unwilling to challenge the party establishment's culture of conformity, the DNC has remained within the Biden-Harris shadow throughout this past year. Releasing an official autopsy might have shown whether party leaders are interested to promote honest conversation regarding the errors which allowed the former president to win re-election. Yet, the leadership is moving forward under the pretense that there is little to glean from the electoral catastrophe from the last cycle.

The top priority: is this good for winning elections? Should the answer be negative, it’s a distraction from the core mission," an explanation which was presented to justify concealing the document.

Critical Problems an Autopsy Could Have Addressed

A genuine analysis of substance would confront certain uncomfortable matters. Among them are:

• Voter Alienation: The loss among millions of voters who voted for the party's candidate during the previous election proved pivotal during the tight recent race.
• The Insistence to Seek Re-election: The determined decision by a party leader to stay in the race, coupled with an extremely delayed exit, has been criticized as denying Democratic voters of a genuine choice.
• Failing the Working-Class Base: Amid economic anxiety, the electoral effort is criticized for accommodating corporate donors' interests and not managing to challenge the effects of profit-seeking.
• A Gaza Effect: The failure to reconsider a policy position on the situation in Gaza reportedly led to alienating key demographic groups, particularly with youth voters, Arab-Americans, Muslim voters.
• Eroding Young Voter Allegiance: Polling data shows a huge decrease of votes for the candidate from voters aged 18-29.

A History Avoiding Accountability

This refusal fits a recurring tendency of sidestepping difficult realities. It echoes an episode where nearly all elected Democrat in Congress acquiesced to a sitting president's determination to running for re-election until a disastrous televised debate compelled an exit.

At the same time, large majorities within the party's base had been continually telling pollsters that they did not want that candidate to run again.

Campaign Spending Issues

A thorough report would also investigate matters regarding financial allocations, such as how much money flowed to insider consultants and advertising contractors during a campaign that managed to spend an enormous sum in a short period.

The Underlying Issue

Fundamentally, the suppression regarding the analysis highlights a submission toward the existing power structure responsible for a losing national race. The message to ordinary supporters – including millions of dedicated activists – is that they cannot have a right to see the lessons the leadership claim to have learned based on hundreds of interviews compiled from extensive interviews.

A political entity incapable to honestly assess its own failings finds it difficult to climb out of the rut that ended up being so advantageous to the winning candidate.